Orthodontic Research - Braces, Retainers, Treatment

Orthodontic Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Orthodontic, including details on braces, retainers, treatment.


Orthodontic Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Orthodontic

Books on Orthodontic

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



In-vivo and in-vitro comparison of bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel and debonded at various times.

Hajrassie MK, Khier SE

Orthodontists Division, King Saud University, Riyad; specialist in orthodontics, Ministry of Health, King Fahad Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. manars2@yahoo.com

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to measure and compare in-vivo and in-vitro bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to human enamel and debonded at various times. An in-vivo debonding device was validated and used to measure bond strengths in the oral environment. METHODS: For the in-vitro study, mini-twin metallic premolar brackets (Opti-mesh XRT, Oromco Corp, Glendora, Calif) precoated with Transbond XT composite resin (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) were bonded to 60 extracted premolars. The teeth were divided into 4 groups of 15, and shear bond strength was tested on a universal testing machine at 4 time periods: 10 minutes, 24 hours, 1 week, and 4 weeks. For the in-vivo test, 60 premolars in 22 volunteers (dental students) from King Saud University were bonded with Mini-Twin metallic premolar brackets and divided into 4 groups; bond strengths were measured at 10 minutes, 24 hours, 1 week, and 4 weeks. RESULTS: Statistical analysis with 1-way ANOVA at P <.05 showed no significant differences among the in-vitro or the in-vivo groups. Two-way ANOVA at P <.05 was used to compare the in-vitro results with the in-vivo results; the in-vivo group had significantly lower mean bond strength values. In addition, survival analysis, used to calculate the probability of bond failure at P <.05, confirmed the significant difference between in-vitro and in-vivo environments. CONCLUSIONS: Reported bond strength values are not time dependent.

Published 9 March 2007 in Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131(3): 384-90.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Orthodontic Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Orthodontic Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (March)
  Issue 2 (April)
  Issue 3 (May)
  Issue 4 (June)
  Issue 5 (July)
  Issue 6 (August)
  Issue 7 (September)
  Issue 8 (October)
  Issue 9 (November)
  Issue 10 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)



Orthodontic Books

An Evaluation of Orthodontic Practice Management Software: Maximizing the Return on the Investment of the Orthodontist

An Evaluation of Orthodontic Practice Management Software: Maximizing the Return on the Investment of the Orthodontist