Orthodontic Research - Braces, Retainers, Treatment

Orthodontic Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Orthodontic, including details on braces, retainers, treatment.


Orthodontic Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Orthodontic

Books on Orthodontic

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Comparison of wire loop and shear blade as the 2 most common methods for testing orthodontic shear bond strength.

Mojtahedzadeh F, Akhoundi MS, Noroozi H

Department of Orthodontics, Kerman School of Dentistry, Kerman, Iran. mojzad@sina.tums.ac.ir

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare 2 common methods of measuring orthodontic shear bond strength. METHODS: Brackets were bonded to 40 bovine incisors, and the teeth were mounted in a jig. The teeth were paired for symmetry, and the pairs were divided into 2 groups for debonding. In group 1, the shear force was applied with a rectangular wire under the tie wings. In group 2, a shearing blade applied force to the junction between the bracket base and the adhesive. RESULTS: Debonding with the shear blade produced higher (24.86 +/- 7.44 MPa) and more dispersed (coefficient of variation = 29.91%) bond strengths compared with the wire loop (17.12 +/- 3.16 MPa, coefficient of variation = 18.44%). Adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores showed a tendency for cohesive failure in the enamel in the shear-blade group (ARI = 5) compared with adhesive failure (ARI = 3) in the wire group. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to standardize bond strength tests. The results of this study favor the wire-loop method, which might have more similarity to clinical loads. The regression formula might make comparison of previous studies easier.

Published 18 September 2006 in Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130(3): 385-7.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Orthodontic Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Orthodontic Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (March)
  Issue 2 (April)
  Issue 3 (May)
  Issue 4 (June)
  Issue 5 (July)
  Issue 6 (August)
  Issue 7 (September)
  Issue 8 (October)
  Issue 9 (November)
  Issue 10 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)



Orthodontic Books

Dental Terminology

Dental Terminology