Orthodontic Research - Braces, Retainers, Treatment

Orthodontic Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Orthodontic, including details on braces, retainers, treatment.


Orthodontic Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Orthodontic

Books on Orthodontic

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Soft-tissue and cortical-bone thickness at orthodontic implant sites.

Kim HJ, Yun HS, Park HD, Kim DH, Park YC

Division in Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Department of Oral Biology, Oral Science Research Center, Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University, College of Dentistry, Seoul, South Korea.

INTRODUCTION: To obtain sufficient stability of implants, the thickness of the soft tissue and the cortical bone in the placement site must be considered. However, the literature contains few anatomical studies of orthodontic implants. METHODS: To measure soft-tissue and cortical-bone thicknesses, maxillae from 23 Korean cadavers were decalcified, and buccopalatal cross-sectional specimens were obtained. These specimens were made at 3 maxillary midpalatal suture areas: the interdental area between the first and second premolars (group 1), the interdental area between the second premolar and the first molar (group 2), and the interdental area between the first and second molars (group 3). RESULTS: In all groups, buccal soft tissues were thickest closest to and farthest from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and thinnest in the middle. Palatal soft-tissue thickness increased gradually from the CEJ toward the apical region in all groups. Buccal cortical-bone was thickest closest to and farthest from the CEJ and thinnest in the middle in groups 1 and 2. Palatal cortical-bone thickness was greatest 6 mm apical to the CEJ in groups 1 and 3, and 2 mm apical to the CEJ in group 2. Along the midpalatal suture, palatal mucosa remained uniformly 1 mm thick posterior to the incisive papilla. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical placement of miniscrew implants for orthodontic anchorage in the maxillary molar region requires consideration of the placement site and angle based on anatomical characteristics.

Published 14 August 2006 in Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130(2): 177-82.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Orthodontic Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Orthodontic Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (March)
  Issue 2 (April)
  Issue 3 (May)
  Issue 4 (June)
  Issue 5 (July)
  Issue 6 (August)
  Issue 7 (September)
  Issue 8 (October)
  Issue 9 (November)
  Issue 10 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)



Orthodontic Books

Dental Terminology

Dental Terminology