Orthodontic Research - Braces, Retainers, Treatment

Orthodontic Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Orthodontic, including details on braces, retainers, treatment.


Orthodontic Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Orthodontic

Books on Orthodontic

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Orthodontic bracket bonding: enamel bond strength vs time.

Yamamoto A, Yoshida T, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa H, Miyazaki M

Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Tests of bond strength between orthodontic brackets and enamel are generally conducted after at least 24 hours storage in water. However, debonding might occur soon after bracket placement during orthodontic treatment. We investigated the rate of bond strength development for orthodontic adhesives in bracket bonding. METHODS: Four orthodontic adhesive systems were examined. Bovine incisors were mounted in self-curing acrylic resin, and the facial surfaces were wet-ground to expose flat enamel. Orthodontic brackets were bonded according to the manufacturers' instructions. Shear bond strengths were measured after storage in water for 5, 10, and 60 minutes, and 24 hours. Differences between bond strengths at 24 hours and the other test periods were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: All materials tested had the highest bond strengths at 24 hours, and bond strength increased with storage time. The earliest time point at which there was no significant difference in bond strength compared with that at 24 hours was defined as the initial stable time. Differences in this value might have clinical implications for the assessment of orthodontic adhesives, which can incur high stresses immediately after placement. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of development of enamel bond strength must be considered to ensure sufficient maturation of orthodontic adhesives before functional loading.

Published 18 October 2006 in Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130(4): 435.e1-6.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Orthodontic Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Orthodontic Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (March)
  Issue 2 (April)
  Issue 3 (May)
  Issue 4 (June)
  Issue 5 (July)
  Issue 6 (August)
  Issue 7 (September)
  Issue 8 (October)
  Issue 9 (November)
  Issue 10 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)



Orthodontic Books

Textbook of Orthodontics

Textbook of Orthodontics